POSSUM for Operative Morbidity and Mortality Risk – Online Calculator

POSSUM calculates the risk of surgical morbidity and mortality, which can be used to help patients and their families make informed decisions about surgery.
POSSUM for Operative Morbidity and Mortality Risk can be used in patients undergoing emergency and elective general surgical procedures. Risk estimates can help patients and family members in the process of informed consent and in management of expectations.


Physiological score

Norm: 100-120 mm Hg

Norm: 60-100 beats/min

Norm: 120-170 g/L (12-17 g/dL)

Norm: 3,7-10,7×10³ cells/µL (3,7-10,7×10⁹ cells/L)

Norm: 2,9-7,1 mmol/L (8-20 mg/dL)

Norm: 136-145 mmol/L (136-145 mEq/L)

Norm: 3,5-5 mmol/L (3,5-5 mEq/L)

Operative severity score

Diagnosed before or during surgery

* Required

The Physiological and Operating Severity Scale for Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) estimates morbidity and mortality in general surgery.

It can be used for both emergency and planned surgery. The POSSUM should be calculated when the decision to operate is made. The percentages can be shared with the patient when discussing the risks of the operation.

To score on the POSSUM scale is an addition of selected points.

Physiological score and operation severity score are weighted differently.

Assessment parameter Points
Physiological score  
Age, years≤601
CardiacNo failure1
 Diuretic, digoxin or angina/hypertension meds2
 Peripheral edema, warfarin, or borderline cardiomegaly on chest X-ray (CXR)4
 Raised jugular venous pressure, or cardiomegaly on CXR8
RespiratoryNo dyspnea1
 Exertional dyspnea or mild COPD on CXR2
 Limiting dyspnea or moderate COPD on CXR4
 Dyspnea at rest or fibrosis/consolidation on CXR8
sBP mm Hg
Norm: 100-120 mm Hg
HR, beats/min
Norm: 60-100, beats/min
Glasgow Coma Scale151
Norm: 120-170 g/L (12-17 g/dL)
≤ 99≤ 9.98
Norm: 3,7-10,7×103 cells/µL (3,7-10,7×109 cells/L)
Norm: 2,9-7,1 mmol/L (8-20 mg/dL)
≤ 45≤7.51
Norm: 136-145 mmol/L (136-145 mEq/L)
 131-135 2
Norm: 3,5-5 mmol/L (3,5-5 mEq/L)
 3.2-3.4 2
 Atrial fibrillation (HR 60-90)4
 Any other abnormal rhythm, or 5 ectopic beats/min, Q waves or ST/T wave changes8
Operative severity score  
Operative severityMinor1
 Moderate (appendectomy, cholecystectomy, mastectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate)2
 Major (laparotomy, bowel resection, cholecystectomy w choledochotomy, peripheral vascular procedure or major amputation)4
 Major+ (aortic procedure, abdominoperineal resection, pancreatic or liver resection, esophagogastrectomy)8
Number of procedures11
Estimated blood loss, ml  
Peritoneal soilingNone1
 Minor (serous fluid)2
 Local pus4
 Free bowel content, pus or blood8
Presence of malignancy
Diagnosed before or during surgery
 Primary only2
 Lymph node mets4
 Distant mets8
Mode of surgeryElective1
 Emergency (within 24h), resuscitation >2h possible4
 Emergency (within 2h)8

Severity of surgeries:

  • Moderate: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, mastectomy, TURP
  • Major: laparotomy, bowel resection, cholecystectomy w choledochotomy, peripheral vascular procedure or major amputation
  • Major+: aortic procedure, abdominoperineal resection, pancreatic or liver resection, esophagogastrectomy

The POSSUM morbidity and mortality formulas are shown below:

  • Morbidity ln[R/(1-R)] = – 5,91 + (0,16 x Physiological score) + (0,19 x operation severity score) (P<0,001).
  • Mortality  ln [R/(1 –R)] = -7,04+ (0,13 x Physiological score) + (0,16 x operation severity score) (P <0,001).

Predicied versus observed rates for mortality and morbidity*

Predicted risk (%)MortalityMorbidity

Morbidity was defined as any of the following:

  • Wound haemorrhage: local haematoma requiring evacuation
  • Deep haemorrhage: postoperative bleeding requiring re-exploration
  • Chest infection: production of purulent sputum with positive

bacteriological cultures, with or without chest radiography changes or pyrexia, or consolidation seen on chest radiograph

  • Woundinfection: wound cellulitis or the discharge ofpurulent exudate
  • Urinary infection: the presence of z lo5 bacteria/ml with the presence of white cells in the urine, in previously clear urine
  • Deep infection: the presence of an intra-abdominal collection confirmed clinically or radiologically.
  • Septicaemia: positive blood culture
  • Pyrexia of unknown origin: any temperature above 37°C for more than 24 h occurring after the original pyrexia following surgery (if present) had settled, for which no obvious cause could be found
  • Wound dehiscence: superficial or deep wound breakdown
  • Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus: when suspected, confirmed radiologically by venography or ventilation/perfusion scanning, or diagnosed at post mortem
  • Cardiac failure: symptoms or signs of left ventricular or congestive cardiac failure which required an alteration from preoperative therapeutic measures
  • Impaired renal function: arbitrarily defined as an increase in blood urea of > 5 mmol/l from preoperative levels
  • Hypotension: a fall in systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg for more than 2 h as determined by sphygmomanometry or arterial pressure transducer measurement
  • “Any other complication”

The POSSUM was originally developed by Copeland and colleagues in 1991 to assess quality of care and provide a scoring system for surgical audit. Physiological and operative severity score data were obtained from 1,372 patients.

The original POSSUM was modified to the Portsmouth POSSUM, or P-POSSUM, in 1998 by Prytherch and colleagues, who derived a more accurate prediction for the mortality component.

Both the POSSUM and P-POSSUM slightly overestimate both morbidity and mortality.

Since the original publication of POSSUM, the score has been modified and validated for numerous subtypes of surgeries and clinical scenarios, including:

  • Colorectal surgery
  • Vascular surgery
  • Oncologic gastric surgery
  • Hepatectomy
  • Emergency laparotomy
  • Orthopedic surgery

The original POSSUM was modified by researchers in Portsmouth who derived a more accurate prediction of mortality, and the P-POSSUM model is now more commonly used to calculate the mortality component.

The POSSUM data set excludes trauma patients, so POSSUM should NOT be used to predict morbidity and mortality after trauma surgery.

The POSSUM should NOT dictate the decision to operate, which is a clinical decision.

Physiological score should be calculated at the time of surgery, not at the time of admission.

The definitions of surgical procedures are guidelines only. Not all procedures are listed, and the closest approximation should be selected.

The POSSUM may overestimate risk in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery.

Similar / alternative tools:

  • There are procedure-specific models for colorectal surgery (CR-POSSUM), vascular surgery (Vascular-POSSUM), and esophagogastric surgery (O-POSSUM, O for oesophagogastric).
  • APACHE II is a similar assessment tool but is applied to intensive care patients and only assesses the risk of mortality.
  • The Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) offers similar estimates for morbidity and mortality.
  • The POSSUM is more comprehensive than the SAS (which is calculated based on 3 parameters), but the SAS is more objective.
  • The SAS uses intraoperative parameters exclusively, whereas the POSSUM uses preoperative parameters.
  • The ACS NSQIP risk calculator is a newer, similar assessment. It has not yet been as rigorously validated as the POSSUM.
  • Other disease-specific scores may be used to assess risk, e.g. Revised Cardiac Risk Index for Pre-Operative Risk.

Register on our website right now to have access to more learning materials!

Subscribe to our pages:


  1. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 1991;78(3):355-60. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2021856/
  2. Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ. POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 1998 Sep;85(9):1217-20. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9752863/
  3. Ramkumar T, Ng V, Fowler L, Farouk R. A comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM for the prediction of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Mar;49(3):330-5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16421662/
  4. Tez M, Yoldaş O, Gocmen E, Külah B, Koc M. Evaluation of P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection. World J Surg. 2006 Dec;30(12):2266-9. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17103102/
  5. Lam CM, Fan ST, Yuen AW, Law WL, Poon K. Validation of POSSUM scoring systems for audit of major hepatectomy. Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):450-4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15048745/
  6. Mohil RS, Bhatnagar D, Bahadur L, Rajneesh, Dev DK, Magan M. POSSUM and P-POSSUM for risk-adjusted audit of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Br J Surg. 2004 Apr;91(4):500-3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15048756/
  7. van Zeeland ML, Genovesi IP, Mulder JW, Strating PR, Glas AS, Engel AF. POSSUM predicts hospital mortality and long-term survival in patients with hip fractures. J Trauma. 2011 Apr;70(4):E67-72. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21613973/
  8. Chen T, Wang H, Wang H, Song Y, Li X, Wang J. POSSUM and P-POSSUM as predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug;20(8):2501-10. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23435569/
  9. Copeland GP. The POSSUM System of Surgical Audit. Arch Surg. 2002;137(1):15-19. doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.1.15. http://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/212013

Interactive OSCE Checklist – Emergency care of a patient with chest pain – Acute Coronary Syndrome with ST-segment elevation and equivalents


• Opening the consultation

• Availability of a defibrillator

• Presenting complaint

• History of presenting complaint

• Past medical history

• Drug history

• Physical examination

• Intravenous access

• Registration of a 12-channel ECG

• Express test for the determination of cardiac troponin, myoglobin, creatine phosphokinase-MB, if possible

• Making preliminary diagnosis

• Drug therapy (basic)

• Evaluation of the door-balloon time (the choice of further reperfusion strategy aimed as soon as possible to restore the coronary blood flow in the infarct-dependent artery)

• Call the nearest reperfusion center

• P2Y12 receptor inhibitor prescription depending on the chosen strategy of reperfusion therapy

• Carrying out thrombolytic therapy as needed

• Transportation to the nearest reperfusion center

Total: 0 / 62
Additional materials: https://clincasequest.hospital/chest-pain-history-taking/ https://clincasequest.hospital/pericarditis/ https://clincasequest.hospital/stephen-smiths-formula/ https://clincasequest.hospital/wellens-syndrome/ https://clincasequest.hospital/aslangers-pattern/ Register on our website right…
Read More

Related Articles

Register and get a gift!

User registration

  • Use only Latin letters and numbers.

  • Strength indicator

    Password at least 12 characters, uppercase and lowercase letters, numbers and symbols like! "? $ ^ &